Tad, Thanks for offering to run a regularly update demo instance. That'll be useful for everybody. If you already have a box, I suggest that you go ahead and use that. I will continue to run acmewave.com on the Oregon machine (though I won't promise that I'll update it on a predictable schedule). In that way we don't put all our eggs in the same basket.
Why don't you plan to let your demo federate? (Just curious. The demo will be useful regardless.) Soren On Sat, Nov 20, 2010 at 5:21 AM, Tad Glines <[email protected]> wrote: > Speaking of "latest". I think that it would make sense to maintain three sub > domains: latest, stable, demo. In all likelihood, stable and demo would be > the same version but possibly separate instances. Latest and stable could be > configured to only reset when the tip or stable tag changes. Demo should > probably be reset every 24 hours. I'm not sure if it makes sense to enable > federation on any but the dogfood edition. > > I think a domain that more closely identifies with the brand (Wave in a Box) > would be more appropriate. > As for where to run it, if someone wants to manage it on the OSU box that's > fine with me. I'll help if given access. > I also have an 8 core 16GB ESXi box hosted in a data center across the > parking lot from where I work. It's a personal box and it's under utilized. > So, I have no problem hosting the demos there. > > -Tad > > On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 10:09 AM, Alex North <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Of course, the box is a separate issue to the domain. We could point >> another domain at the same box. We could use subdomains: >> latest.acmewave.com:80. >> >> On 19 November 2010 10:09, Alex North <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> We could run such a service on acmewave.com (on some other port). >>> I think our intent was that acmewave.com:80 would be the "dogfood" >>> instance - we'd push regularly but once the software reaches some level of >>> stability we'd attempt to keep the data intact. >>> We could run a "latest" on some other port, refreshing it regularly and >>> throwing out data at whim. This would save us having another box to >>> administer. >>> I'll check up on our use of the acmewave.com box (donated by Oregon State >>> Uni) but it should be reasonable to give some more community members access >>> to it (Soren?). >>> A. >>> >>> On 19 November 2010 09:32, Tad Glines <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> My intent was to have a server running at demo.<some-domain> >>>> >>>> I really don't care what the domain is as long at it clearly identifies >>>> what it's a demo of. >>>> >>>> I've created a poll in a wave: >>>> https://wave.google.com/wave/#restored:wave:googlewave.com%252Fw%252By0roFeC_A.1 >>>> >>>> Let the voting begin! >>>> >>>> Make suggestions and I'll add them to the poll. You can vote for more >>>> than one item. >>>> >>>> -Tad >>>> >>>> On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 9:10 AM, STenyaK <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Maybe it should be something more like wiab-demo.org, or >>>>> demo.wave-in-the-box.org, or wave-in-the-box.org/demo for the demo >>>>> itself, and leave wave-in-the-box.org or similar ones for an official >>>>> wiab homepage? >>>>> >>>>> On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 18:04, antwatkins <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> > Not a bad idea, but wavesandbox.org is taken and I assume Tad wants >>>>> > to >>>>> > set this up soon, which won't allow us to go with the .com (at least >>>>> > right now). >>>>> > >>>>> > I like the idea of the poll. >>>>> > >>>>> > One thing to consider is what we refer to this as. Many people will >>>>> > have demo servers stood up, but this one has a special purpose and >>>>> > should be a resource people can depend upon from a community >>>>> > perspective. So if we advise someone to go to the Wave box (or >>>>> > sandbox or whatever else the community comes up with) to experiment >>>>> > with the latest push, it has a defined meaning. >>>>> > >>>>> > -anthony >>>>> > >>>>> > On Nov 19, 11:52 am, Michael MacFadden <[email protected]> >>>>> > wrote: >>>>> >> I have two suggestions, what about taking over "wavesandbox.com" >>>>> >> from >>>>> >> google eventually. Or is wavesandbox.org available? >>>>> >> >>>>> >> On Nov 19, 8:42 am, antwatkins <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> > I generally don't like dashes, but I see waveinabox.org and >>>>> >> > wiab.org >>>>> >> > is taken. How about we shorten it to wavebox.org. That's available >>>>> >> > and >>>>> >> > "in a" aren't really key words. >>>>> >> >>>>> >> > Either way I'm happy. Thanks for setting this up. >>>>> >> >>>>> >> > -anthony >>>>> >> >>>>> >> > On Nov 19, 11:33 am, Tad Glines <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >> >>>>> >> > > I'm thinking of setting up a demo WiaB server on a WiaB domain. >>>>> >> >>>>> >> > > The demo server would reset every every 24 hours, would not >>>>> >> > > federate and >>>>> >> > > would update to tip during each reset. >>>>> >> >>>>> >> > > Does anyone have any objections to me purchasing the domain " >>>>> >> > > wave-in-a-box.org"? >>>>> >> >>>>> >> > > -Tad >>>>> > >>>>> > -- >>>>> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>>> > Groups "Wave Protocol" group. >>>>> > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >>>>> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >>>>> > [email protected]. >>>>> > For more options, visit this group at >>>>> > http://groups.google.com/group/wave-protocol?hl=en. >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Saludos, >>>>> Bruno González >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Jabber: stenyak AT gmail.com >>>>> http://www.stenyak.com >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>>> Groups "Wave Protocol" group. >>>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >>>>> [email protected]. >>>>> For more options, visit this group at >>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/wave-protocol?hl=en. >>>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>> Groups "Wave Protocol" group. >>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >>>> [email protected]. >>>> For more options, visit this group at >>>> http://groups.google.com/group/wave-protocol?hl=en. >>> >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "Wave Protocol" group. >> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> [email protected]. >> For more options, visit this group at >> http://groups.google.com/group/wave-protocol?hl=en. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Wave Protocol" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/wave-protocol?hl=en. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Wave Protocol" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/wave-protocol?hl=en.
