Comparing WAIB to gwave isn't a fair comparison anyway, becuase gwave was supposed to be a Google Brand Product. However it is doable becuase gwave never had focus and didn't directly target anyone for any niches, and wasn't comparable to their other products in term of quality control, so therefore you can say it was an example of the infrastructure and compare it that way.
WAIB is much more about a facility which will work out of the box. But also can be developed to meet actual use cases. In fact this exactly what was needed in the first place. It just seems bad for those that have to wait for it. I don't morn gwave. It is the technology that lives on. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Wave Protocol" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/wave-protocol?hl=en.
