On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 10:50 AM, Vega <[email protected]> wrote: > 4)Hardware infrastructure - in fact the Apache infrastructure seems to > be inferior to current Wiab setup. Moreover, if I understand it right, > they insist that all communication and decision making should be done > with the mail lists - which prevents us from hosting dog food server > for the about needs. I think it is very severe limitations. Also svn > is inferior to mercurial. In fact I think that point (4) is in fact > disadvantage. >
All decisions must occur on the mailing list. And, discussions about decisions are strongly discouraged from happening off-list. There is nothing preventing us from using a dog-food instance for general discussion. I think we all agree that Wave is a superior model for decision making type discussion/coordination. So, I suspect that at some point Apache might decide that it's ok to use of Wave as the primary communication tool for a project. -Tad -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Wave Protocol" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/wave-protocol?hl=en.
