On Dec 3, 1:23 am, James Purser <[email protected]> wrote: > Actually I'm more than willing to bet that most enterprise setups will be > gun shy about having waves be automatically public, as will many users. > > Personally I like the model GWave has at the moment: > I just want to add that: 1) GWave failed to gain traction regardless of being really revolutionary product. Therefore it might make sense to try to do some basic things differently or at least provide support for this. 2) Many agree that GWave was good at many things, but failed to be the best at anything. Of course Wiab cannot provide multiple skins out of the box, but maybe it would be useful to define a set of purposes and then prioritize them, so whenever a question of default behavior would emerge - it can be evaluated against this set as to allow consistency. It also means that main target user base should be defined. Is it private users? Small businesses? Enterprises? Trying to satisfy everybody will result in repeating Gwave mistake i.e. - in satisfying no one.
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Wave Protocol" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/wave-protocol?hl=en.
