As i said before - if someone would like to create "private" wave - it
should be supported.
Also, it seems that because of wave ambiguity, everybody think about
something else when they hear "wave".
I arrive to conclusion that STenyaK is right and the default behavior
should be dependent on context. If someone wants to use Wave as blog -
then public should be default, however in context of email it probably
should be private...

On Dec 2, 10:49 pm, "Gamer_Z." <[email protected]> wrote:
> Except wave is not a social network or micro-blogging site (although
> it could be integrated into one).  It is also used for e-mail-type
> conversations IM-type conversations, and document creation.  Imagine
> if every time you created a document in Gdocs, MS Word, Pages, or
> OpenOffice it was public.  What about if every Gtalk or AIM
> conversation were public?  What about if every single e-mail you sent
> or received were public.  See the problem there?  And even in your
> example, Facebook and Twitter posts remain private until you click the
> "Share" or "Tweet" button.  It is much better for every wave to start
> and remain private until the user wants to add participants or make it
> public.
>
> On Dec 2, 3:19 pm, Vega <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > Hmm, let's imagine that Twitter would be "private" by default, i.e.
> > every twit would be private so only people that you explicitly
> > specified would see the contents of the twit - do you think that would
> > be help it to become something like it is now? Or if Facebook would be
> > private by default... Wave is the collaboration platform where things
> > are shared openly. Of course if someone wants to change the settings -
> > it should be supported.
>
> > On Dec 2, 7:33 pm, Bertine van Hövell <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > I prefer to keep private as the default. If you accidentally keep
> > > confidential content private, the only loss is to you. If you
> > > accidentally leave confidential content public, you'll have a much
> > > larger problem at hand.
>
> > > To give an example. I use google docs often, but in my main list I
> > > often see a few documents popping up of which I'm sure the person
> > > didn't mean to share it with *everyone*, and that's even in a medium
> > > when you have to choose to share. Imagine what would happen if gdocs
> > > would be public by default.
>
> > > Seeing as Wave is a safe way to be able to share private information
> > > (and in some cases is the reason why people continue to use it until
> > > now), I prefer to keep 'private' as default.
>
> > > On Dec 2, 12:10 pm, Vega <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > The current default wave mode is "private", i.e. whenever a new wave
> > > > is created, it can be accessed only by the owner and then by
> > > > participants added by owner.
> > > > I think that this concept is not something  that is obvious. It seems
> > > > to me that it evolved this way since originally, Wave was created as
> > > > email replacement. However, as we see, Wave is a lot more. It is a
> > > > platform for collaboration, and as such it should embrace its users to
> > > > share the content, not to hide it. Off course, if someone wants to
> > > > create private wave, or change the default settings - it should be
> > > > supported.
> > > > The official reason for Google Wave development discontinuation was
> > > > "lack of traction". I think the main reason for this - there's was
> > > > very little public content. Because in Google Wave everything is
> > > > private/limited until stated otherwise. Why not change it? Why not
> > > > make everything public until stated otherwise?
> > > > It may be a small change that makes a lot of difference.
> > > > For example, I guess everybody knows the Flckr service. The company
> > > > allowed users to upload images to its servers and share it. It wasn't
> > > > the only one at the time, however it was the first to make the images
> > > > public by default and it resulted in huge success.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Wave 
Protocol" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/wave-protocol?hl=en.

Reply via email to