On 12/02/2010 04:09 PM, STenyaK wrote:
> Yes. Additionally, for every successful web service or social network
> or whatever network-based application there is, there are also a
> hundred very similar ones that failed, regardless of any public vs.
> private default mode of contents addition. Of course, those haven't
> been brought to the table since no one actually knows those cases
> because, well... they were a failure. No matter if they were public,
> or private, or whatever by default.
> 
> Try to sell Wave to an enterprise, telling them that every time they
> want a wave not be out on the wild internet, they'll have to manually
> specify it.

Novell Vibe has default public / feed "waves" and it's not been a problem so 
far with the
enterprise.  After all, we're talking about a collaboration product - although 
it might not always
be the intended case, the more you make it easier to share the better.  
Otherwise all we have is
email / private msgs and why change from email?

> 
> 
> That's not to say that public-default doesn't have its use cases. But
> the public vs private setting is independent from Wave Protocol. It
> must be up to the client to do that. If you use Wave Protocol to build
> a facebook-like, or a twitter-like wave client, then fine, use public
> waving by default.
> But people who use Wave Protocol for keeping track of personal notes,
> or personal documents, or emailing the family or friends, or doing
> some internal project management, will want a client that default to
> private waves.
> 
> 
> So, I think it's clear this discussion should not be about Wave, but
> about certain Wave client. Specifically, being on the mailing list we
> are, the WiaB default web client.
> Starting from there, we can discuss whether we want WiaB Client to
> create public waves by default or not.
> 
>  And in that case, I personally think that WiaB Client should have
> public waves by default, because i think it'll allow to "get the word
> out" faster than with private default. But an easy way to toggle it
> should be provided, probably defined per-user, so that people like me
> can still use Wave as a private wiki for personal notes, or whatever
> :-)
> 
> 
> On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 21:49, Gamer_Z. <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Except wave is not a social network or micro-blogging site (although
>> it could be integrated into one).  It is also used for e-mail-type
>> conversations IM-type conversations, and document creation.  Imagine
>> if every time you created a document in Gdocs, MS Word, Pages, or
>> OpenOffice it was public.  What about if every Gtalk or AIM
>> conversation were public?  What about if every single e-mail you sent
>> or received were public.  See the problem there?  And even in your
>> example, Facebook and Twitter posts remain private until you click the
>> "Share" or "Tweet" button.  It is much better for every wave to start
>> and remain private until the user wants to add participants or make it
>> public.
>>
>> On Dec 2, 3:19 pm, Vega <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> Hmm, let's imagine that Twitter would be "private" by default, i.e.
>>> every twit would be private so only people that you explicitly
>>> specified would see the contents of the twit - do you think that would
>>> be help it to become something like it is now? Or if Facebook would be
>>> private by default... Wave is the collaboration platform where things
>>> are shared openly. Of course if someone wants to change the settings -
>>> it should be supported.
>>>
>>> On Dec 2, 7:33 pm, Bertine van Hövell <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> I prefer to keep private as the default. If you accidentally keep
>>>> confidential content private, the only loss is to you. If you
>>>> accidentally leave confidential content public, you'll have a much
>>>> larger problem at hand.
>>>
>>>> To give an example. I use google docs often, but in my main list I
>>>> often see a few documents popping up of which I'm sure the person
>>>> didn't mean to share it with *everyone*, and that's even in a medium
>>>> when you have to choose to share. Imagine what would happen if gdocs
>>>> would be public by default.
>>>
>>>> Seeing as Wave is a safe way to be able to share private information
>>>> (and in some cases is the reason why people continue to use it until
>>>> now), I prefer to keep 'private' as default.
>>>
>>>> On Dec 2, 12:10 pm, Vega <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>>> The current default wave mode is "private", i.e. whenever a new wave
>>>>> is created, it can be accessed only by the owner and then by
>>>>> participants added by owner.
>>>>> I think that this concept is not something  that is obvious. It seems
>>>>> to me that it evolved this way since originally, Wave was created as
>>>>> email replacement. However, as we see, Wave is a lot more. It is a
>>>>> platform for collaboration, and as such it should embrace its users to
>>>>> share the content, not to hide it. Off course, if someone wants to
>>>>> create private wave, or change the default settings - it should be
>>>>> supported.
>>>>> The official reason for Google Wave development discontinuation was
>>>>> "lack of traction". I think the main reason for this - there's was
>>>>> very little public content. Because in Google Wave everything is
>>>>> private/limited until stated otherwise. Why not change it? Why not
>>>>> make everything public until stated otherwise?
>>>>> It may be a small change that makes a lot of difference.
>>>>> For example, I guess everybody knows the Flckr service. The company
>>>>> allowed users to upload images to its servers and share it. It wasn't
>>>>> the only one at the time, however it was the first to make the images
>>>>> public by default and it resulted in huge success.
>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "Wave Protocol" group.
>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>> [email protected].
>> For more options, visit this group at 
>> http://groups.google.com/group/wave-protocol?hl=en.
>>
>>
> 
> 
> 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Wave 
Protocol" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/wave-protocol?hl=en.

Reply via email to