On 07/25/2012 05:00 PM, Pekka Paalanen wrote:
Gears will now need the same disclaimer as glxgears has, otherwise end
users will start using this as a generic Wayland performance
benchmark. I can imagine some headlines on Phoronix when they compare
Wayland gears with glxgears and draw wildly incorrect conclusions. I
hope you will add a message explaining what this "fps" number really
means and what it can be used for. Thanks, pq
Right, it would only make sense for a fps count sensibly lower than page
flip or refresh frequency.
This small patch has been useful for me with a fullscreen 1080p gears,
to check that llvmpipe was performing faster than DRI (using a software
fallback on Intel Q35).
But I agree that with better performing hardware or drivers, it would
not be a good metric.
Should I still rework the patch with a warning message?
Thanks for the feedback
--
Olivier Blin - SoftAtHome
This message and any attachments herein are confidential, intended solely for
the addressees and are SoftAtHome's ownership. Any unauthorized use or
dissemination is prohibited. If you are not the intended addressee of this
message, please cancel it immediately and inform the sender.
_______________________________________________
wayland-devel mailing list
wayland-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/wayland-devel
