> it certainly would be "quicker to market" if interested folks each took
> a chapter <g> ... moreover, while such an effort would definitely
> require an editor [and wouldn't generate a lot of $ to the many authors]
> I think that having a group of consultants collaborate and agree [or
> disagree] on different web issues would be a valuable book.
>
> i'm game <g> ...
I'm game, too. It would have to be quick to market, for sure. Then again,
there are many sites on the web that already do that kind of thing: collect
writing from various authors and stick them under one roof, with a "stamp of
approval". I don't hear about them publishing books very often (though
webmonkey couled probably put together a rather good one). Maybe there's a
reason? Could there be a collaborative web site in this list's future?
Picture a few editors, a few dozen or more writers and maybe a
collaboratively set agenda, maybe even a wish list: "I need a basic
introduction to Perl", "Can someone help me write a custom Cold Fusion
tag?", "How do you set Cookies using Javascript", etc.
Jack
____________________________________________________________________
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Join The Web Consultants Association : Register on our web site Now
Web Consultants Web Site : http://just4u.com/webconsultants
If you lose the instructions All subscription/unsubscribing can be done
directly from our website for all our lists.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
