> > Apparently this is some kind of Floating Point specification, with
> My guess is someone released an NT vs. UNIX spec report. Not sure of
> specifics of SPECfp92, but have seen reports lately for SPECfp95.
You may be right about that, as the surge was followed by two hours
of queries on windows 98 performance. That faded as Winnie the Pooh won
top position on one of the smaller search engines for an hour. And now
everyone is home, ((4pm, 5pm, 6pm) it's chat and beastiality again.
Everyone's home and ready to pursue their favorite hobbies... (Laughing!)
Anyone have Dave "I'm not making this up" Barry's e-mail address?
> Appears to be an upgraded spec, and MS was tooting their horn last week
> because NT, which used to run at only 60-70% of the efficiency of UNIX
> measured by this spec, runs at 80-88% under the new spec.
>
> When you can't improve the product, change the measuring stick ;)
Doesn't everyone?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ------------------ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------
Know what folks search for: http://www.mall-net.com/se_report/
---------------------------------------------------------------
----------------- Every mouse click, a Vote -------------------
---------- Do they vote For, or Against your pages? -----------
--- Have you analyzed your viewer's footprints in the logs? ---
---------------------------------------------------------------
____________________________________________________________________
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Join The Web Consultants Association : Register on our web site Now
Web Consultants Web Site : http://just4u.com/webconsultants
If you lose the instructions All subscription/unsubscribing can be done
directly from our website for all our lists.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
