On Thu, Feb 04, 1999 at 07:36:46AM -0500, P.A. Gantt wrote:
> In the main I agree but if one is a true
> free speech advocate one must defend the
> right of others to speak their minds
> despite the abhorrent message.
I would put it this way: "defend the right of others to engage
in constitutionally-protected speech". That excludes speech-
which-is-not-constitutionally-protected and conduct, both of which
are factors in this particular case.
> not having visited the site because it
> offends my personal beliefs, but I am curious
> if the murder threat is implied or simply
> extrapolated from innuendo or site detractors???
I would recommend that you visit the site(s) in question and see
for yourself. I believe that will make things abundantly clear.
---Rsk
Rich Kulawiec
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
____________________________________________________________________
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Join The NEW Web Consultants Association FORUMS and CHAT:
Register Today at: http://just4u.com/forums/
Web Consultants Web Site : http://just4u.com/webconsultants
Give the Gift of Life This Year...
Just4U Stop Smoking Support forum - helping smokers for
over three years-tell a friend: http://just4u.com/forums/
To get 500 Banner Ads for FREE
go to http://www.linkbuddies.com/start.go?id=111261
---------------------------------------------------------------------
