Clark C. Evans wrote: > I'd very much like to see a _usable_ WSGI server included in the > standard Python library: I don't care how it is done. > > It should have a few requirements: > ... > - it should _not_ have any functionality beyond the > minimums required by WSGI: specificially, it should > not handle multiple WSGI applications (routing)
Having just added routing to CherryPy's WSGI server in less than a dozen lines of code, I'd be interested to know why you feel routing shouldn't be included. Robert Brewer System Architect Amor Ministries [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ Web-SIG mailing list Web-SIG@python.org Web SIG: http://www.python.org/sigs/web-sig Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/web-sig/archive%40mail-archive.com
