On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 12:03 PM, Armin Ronacher <armin.ronac...@active-4.com> wrote: >> It looks like python3 issues are being addressed in your changes anyway. > But it should be discussed separately and then be integrated. The > changes in the PEP currently reflect #1 of Graham's proposal. >
yeah cool. Here's a new thread for the python3 related changes... Perhaps a good way to test that, is to make a smallish example wsgi program to port to python3, using the various proposals... or the proposal most liked. Then we could see how easy it would be to port to a given implementation that supports that proposal. I'm not sure which of the proposals Grahams mod_wsgi branch is for... or for the cherrypy branch... but those ones would be easier to test since they're already done. So is there a smallish tested wsgi example around to port? Maybe some of the cherrypy example programs would be a good one to do... if they aren't ported already (if they are ported already... great!) cheers, _______________________________________________ Web-SIG mailing list Web-SIG@python.org Web SIG: http://www.python.org/sigs/web-sig Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/web-sig/archive%40mail-archive.com
