I liked your idea very much Rene' , so I made this:
http://web2py.com/examples/static/sneaky.py
and a Python 3.0 version:
http://web2py.com/examples/static/sneaky3.py
They both may need some testing more testing but I tried the former
with web2py and it works well, including streaming.
Massimo
On Sep 18, 2009, at 1:44 PM, René Dudfield wrote:
On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 12:03 PM, Armin Ronacher
<armin.ronac...@active-4.com> wrote:
It looks like python3 issues are being addressed in your changes
anyway.
But it should be discussed separately and then be integrated. The
changes in the PEP currently reflect #1 of Graham's proposal.
yeah cool. Here's a new thread for the python3 related changes...
Perhaps a good way to test that, is to make a smallish example wsgi
program to port to python3, using the various proposals... or the
proposal most liked.
Then we could see how easy it would be to port to a given
implementation that supports that proposal. I'm not sure which of the
proposals Grahams mod_wsgi branch is for... or for the cherrypy
branch... but those ones would be easier to test since they're already
done.
So is there a smallish tested wsgi example around to port? Maybe some
of the cherrypy example programs would be a good one to do... if they
aren't ported already (if they are ported already... great!)
cheers,
_______________________________________________
Web-SIG mailing list
Web-SIG@python.org
Web SIG: http://www.python.org/sigs/web-sig
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/web-sig/mdipierro%40cti.depaul.edu
_______________________________________________
Web-SIG mailing list
Web-SIG@python.org
Web SIG: http://www.python.org/sigs/web-sig
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/web-sig/archive%40mail-archive.com
