---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Benoit Chesneau <bchesn...@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, Jan 2, 2011 at 10:51 PM
Subject: Re: [Web-SIG] PEP 444 != WSGI 2.0
To: Alice Bevan–McGregor <al...@gothcandy.com>

On Sun, Jan 2, 2011 at 9:38 PM, Alice Bevan–McGregor
<al...@gothcandy.com> wrote:
> On 2011-01-02 11:14:00 -0800, Chris McDonough said:
>>> I'd suggest we just embrace it, adding minor tweaks as necessary, until
>>> we reach some sort of technical impasse it doesn't address.
> Async is one area that 3333 does not cover, and that by not having a
> standard which incorporates async means competing, incompatible solutions
> have been created.

I don't see why async need a specific handling in the spec. What
differences do you need ? Today users are perfectly abble to manage
async using gevent, eventlet, ... behind WSGI 1.0 .

- benoît
Web-SIG mailing list
Web SIG: http://www.python.org/sigs/web-sig

Reply via email to