---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Benoit Chesneau <bchesn...@gmail.com> Date: Sun, Jan 2, 2011 at 10:51 PM Subject: Re: [Web-SIG] PEP 444 != WSGI 2.0 To: Alice Bevan–McGregor <al...@gothcandy.com>
On Sun, Jan 2, 2011 at 9:38 PM, Alice Bevan–McGregor <al...@gothcandy.com> wrote: > On 2011-01-02 11:14:00 -0800, Chris McDonough said: >>> >>> I'd suggest we just embrace it, adding minor tweaks as necessary, until >>> we reach some sort of technical impasse it doesn't address. > > Async is one area that 3333 does not cover, and that by not having a > standard which incorporates async means competing, incompatible solutions > have been created. > I don't see why async need a specific handling in the spec. What differences do you need ? Today users are perfectly abble to manage async using gevent, eventlet, ... behind WSGI 1.0 . - benoît _______________________________________________ Web-SIG mailing list Web-SIG@python.org Web SIG: http://www.python.org/sigs/web-sig Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/web-sig/archive%40mail-archive.com
