Agree, i develop an excelent wsgi server in Py3k, without use the cgi library to extract the data, so is better if in the manual kills the part that indicate use the cgi lib to extract the data.
2011/1/4, Antoine Pitrou <solip...@pitrou.net>: > Alice Bevan–McGregor <al...@...> writes: >> >> [1] http://bit.ly/e7rtI6 > > So, while we are at it, could we get rid of the "CGI server example" in this > new > SWGI spec? > This is 2011, and we should promote modern idioms, not encourage people to > do > 1995 Web programming. 10 years ago, CGI was already frown upon. > (and even the idea that WSGI should provide some kind of CGI compatibility > sounds a bit ridiculous to me) > > Regards > > Antoine. > > > _______________________________________________ > Web-SIG mailing list > Web-SIG@python.org > Web SIG: http://www.python.org/sigs/web-sig > Unsubscribe: > http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/web-sig/hidura%40gmail.com > -- Enviado desde mi dispositivo móvil Diego I. Hidalgo D. _______________________________________________ Web-SIG mailing list Web-SIG@python.org Web SIG: http://www.python.org/sigs/web-sig Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/web-sig/archive%40mail-archive.com
