--- En date de : Jeu 11.12.08, Yarko Tymciurak <[email protected]> a écrit :
That's not necessarily true. You can control what content goes in. Even open
source docs can be sold (printed book is worth something). See (for example)
this project: http://groups.google.com/group/python3patterns and
http://www.bitbucket.org/BruceEckel/python-3-patterns-idioms/
ok then, I'll be happy to contribute to docs that Massimo could sell, for
himself or for web2py founds, I don't care.
This is the "bottom-up" approach; Try things until something starts to feel
right, useful - then document. The other end is to document first (what you
want), and then try to implement (top-down, the document as the spec).
Of course we (including Massimo) would love to have the docs before, but we
have to wait. :)
So - a wiki for documenting current state of affairs might be marginally useful
(until the code changes); A wiki of desired projects might be a useful
top-down piece. How to combine the two in an open, community way - that's a
challenge...
Why is it such a challenge ?
There could be categories/tags to warn the reader: Docs vs W2PEPs.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"web2py Web Framework" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/web2py?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
