Is there any site where we can post improvements that we want to see in web3py? (something like a wish-list)
El 27/11/12 17:28, Massimo Di Pierro escribió: > Hello user, > > The purpose of that thread is to discuss where web2py should got in > the future. For now we refer to that as web3py but noting is settled, > not even the name. > There is a prototype containing some of my ideas for web3py. > > My ideas are: > 1) keep dal, templates, and validators > 2) rewrite source code for forms and helpers (they would work more or > less the same but simpler APIs, now they have too many options) > 3) simplify internal logic (import instead of exec, better use of wsgi > middleware, everything lazy for speed) > 4) support for python 3.3 > 5) a compatibility layer that will allow running legacy web2py apps > when running web3py in python 2.7. > > This means we will keep backward compatibility for legacy apps but new > app will slightly different APIs. > Anyway this is a proposal. people can looks at the prototype. It is > 20x faster on hello world apps. > > I think for now this discussion belongs to web2py-developers and > everybody is welcome to join. > When the proposal is more concrete we can move some of the discussion > here. > > Massimo > > > On Monday, 26 November 2012 22:39:06 UTC-6, User wrote: > > I noticed a thread over in web2py-developers web3py - important! > > <https://groups.google.com/forum/?fromgroups=#%21topic/web2py-developers/RCeiRd3Rzs0> > which > was exciting to read. I've flirted with web2py and there's a lot > that I like about it. For some reason I find web2py exciting > whereas django doesn't provide that. I've used Yii on the php > side which is great framework as far as php goes and asp.net > <http://asp.net> mvc which is great as well. I'd love to work > with python but the main thing making me hesitate with web2py is > critical mass. > > It seems like it wouldn't be hard for web2py to really dominate > the python web framework space if some of the core criticisms were > addressed. I'm not fully up to speed on what they are but I > usually hear about unit testing and global variables. It feels > like there is a roadblock preventing the project from > skyrocketing. Python needs a rails. I understand that the design > decisions are by choice with pros and cons. > > My questions are: > 1. Will web3py likely address these often repeated core > criticisms? (I saw point 5 from the thread linked to above: "5) No > more global environment. Apps will do "from web3py import *" (see > below)") > 2. The developer thread is over in the developers section. Will > you have a more open forum for users (as opposed to developers) to > have input on web3py? > > > > -- > > > --
