I would say get in web2py developper group, find the thread about web3py : web3py important and leave your comments there.
Richard On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 12:40 PM, Daniel González <[email protected]>wrote: > Is there any site where we can post improvements that we want to see in > web3py? (something like a wish-list) > > El 27/11/12 17:28, Massimo Di Pierro escribió: > > Hello user, > > > > The purpose of that thread is to discuss where web2py should got in > > the future. For now we refer to that as web3py but noting is settled, > > not even the name. > > There is a prototype containing some of my ideas for web3py. > > > > My ideas are: > > 1) keep dal, templates, and validators > > 2) rewrite source code for forms and helpers (they would work more or > > less the same but simpler APIs, now they have too many options) > > 3) simplify internal logic (import instead of exec, better use of wsgi > > middleware, everything lazy for speed) > > 4) support for python 3.3 > > 5) a compatibility layer that will allow running legacy web2py apps > > when running web3py in python 2.7. > > > > This means we will keep backward compatibility for legacy apps but new > > app will slightly different APIs. > > Anyway this is a proposal. people can looks at the prototype. It is > > 20x faster on hello world apps. > > > > I think for now this discussion belongs to web2py-developers and > > everybody is welcome to join. > > When the proposal is more concrete we can move some of the discussion > > here. > > > > Massimo > > > > > > On Monday, 26 November 2012 22:39:06 UTC-6, User wrote: > > > > I noticed a thread over in web2py-developers web3py - important! > > < > https://groups.google.com/forum/?fromgroups=#%21topic/web2py-developers/RCeiRd3Rzs0> > which > > was exciting to read. I've flirted with web2py and there's a lot > > that I like about it. For some reason I find web2py exciting > > whereas django doesn't provide that. I've used Yii on the php > > side which is great framework as far as php goes and asp.net > > <http://asp.net> mvc which is great as well. I'd love to work > > with python but the main thing making me hesitate with web2py is > > critical mass. > > > > It seems like it wouldn't be hard for web2py to really dominate > > the python web framework space if some of the core criticisms were > > addressed. I'm not fully up to speed on what they are but I > > usually hear about unit testing and global variables. It feels > > like there is a roadblock preventing the project from > > skyrocketing. Python needs a rails. I understand that the design > > decisions are by choice with pros and cons. > > > > My questions are: > > 1. Will web3py likely address these often repeated core > > criticisms? (I saw point 5 from the thread linked to above: "5) No > > more global environment. Apps will do "from web3py import *" (see > > below)") > > 2. The developer thread is over in the developers section. Will > > you have a more open forum for users (as opposed to developers) to > > have input on web3py? > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > -- > > > > --
