On Friday, March 4, 2016 at 4:56:36 PM UTC-8, Dave S wrote:
>
>
>
> On Friday, March 4, 2016 at 4:01:09 PM UTC-8, Massimo Di Pierro wrote:
>>
>> If you want to try it with web2py here is welcome app based on stupid.css
>>
>> https://github.com/mdipierro/web2py-welcome-theme-stupid
>>
>> Notice a few things:
>> - It does not require any change in the python code or form styles or 
>> grid. I
>> - It works with the existing bootstrap classes, it simply ignores. Too 
>> much trouble to remove them everywhere.
>> - The static folder is significative lighter.
>>
>>
> I copied the appconfig.ini from the standard welcome app; is the 
> [forms]formstyle option ignored?  (bullet 2 suggests 'yes')
>
> Also, on the login form, the "Log In" button is appreciably smaller than 
> the "Sign Up" and the "Lost Password" buttons; is that because it is an 
> input field and the others are button buttons?
>
> The H1 with class="glass" and contents "STUPID.CSS" has a noticeable band 
> over the background picture, slightly higher than the letter height, but 
> not the height of the enclosing DIV.
>
> For the quarter-div with the ADMIN stuff, it looks like I've got a missing 
> glyph -- there's a rectangle about the size of the 'A' in Admin, with the 
> 10-over-01 pattern that I think FF uses for missing font characters.
>

Doh!   This one is on me.  I forgot to tell NoScript to allow that IP 
(127.0.0.1, as it happens).  Updating that got me the gear symbol.
 

>
> Otherwise, the page looks very good!
>  
>
>> Massimo
>>
>>
> Thanks!
>
> /dps
>  
>
>> On Friday, 4 March 2016 08:51:00 UTC-6, villas wrote:
>>>
>>> I love this.  It would be so cool if this was maintained with the rest 
>>> of the framework and widgets could then include the generic stupid.css. 
>>>  The grid could use it and this would resolve a lot of issues with choice 
>>> of css framework.
>>>
>>> A couple of questions spring to mind:
>>> Does anyone need another CSS framework!  Will there be enough support to 
>>> keep it going?  I was reminded of the doubts I had about Markmin,  but this 
>>> has been great and I use it a lot and it seems to have hardly required any 
>>> support or huge extra effort.  I am disappointed that Markmin isn't more 
>>> popular,  but very glad it exists.  I feel that stupid.css could be a 
>>> similar kind of thing.
>>>
>>> Is it intended that users use this for standard widgets and then add 
>>> Bootstrap or Semantic or whatever for any extras?  Its simplicity is not 
>>> going to resolve every requirement.
>>>
>>> I'm not convinced about the name,  but at least it is memorable!
>>>
>>>

-- 
Resources:
- http://web2py.com
- http://web2py.com/book (Documentation)
- http://github.com/web2py/web2py (Source code)
- https://code.google.com/p/web2py/issues/list (Report Issues)
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"web2py-users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to web2py+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to