Another example: http://mdipierro.github.io/stupid.css/themes/gallery.html
On Saturday, 5 March 2016 16:36:28 UTC-6, Massimo Di Pierro wrote: > > You can also compare this: > > http://mdipierro.github.io/stupid.css/themes/landing-page.html > > with this: > > http://blackrockdigital.github.io/startbootstrap-landing-page/ > > The conversion took about 5 minutes (manually). Look at the differences in > the html source. > > On Saturday, 5 March 2016 15:47:12 UTC-6, Massimo Di Pierro wrote: >> >> Anyway, you can check out stupid with web2py here: >> http://experts4solutions.com/stupid >> >> On Saturday, 5 March 2016 15:41:01 UTC-6, Massimo Di Pierro wrote: >>> >>> yes. I added it. >>> >>> I also changed http://mdipierro.github.io/stupid.css/index.html adding >>> more stuff. Now if you click on the examples (?) it shows the source. >>> >>> On Saturday, 5 March 2016 12:14:48 UTC-6, Ron Chatterjee wrote: >>>> >>>> For some reason, I could run the app out of box, it gives me this error >>>> (attached). Is there a config file is missing? >>>> >>>> On Saturday, March 5, 2016 at 1:35:20 AM UTC-5, Massimo Di Pierro wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Friday, 4 March 2016 18:56:36 UTC-6, Dave S wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Friday, March 4, 2016 at 4:01:09 PM UTC-8, Massimo Di Pierro wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> If you want to try it with web2py here is welcome app based on >>>>>>> stupid.css >>>>>>> >>>>>>> https://github.com/mdipierro/web2py-welcome-theme-stupid >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Notice a few things: >>>>>>> - It does not require any change in the python code or form styles >>>>>>> or grid. I >>>>>>> - It works with the existing bootstrap classes, it simply ignores. >>>>>>> Too much trouble to remove them everywhere. >>>>>>> - The static folder is significative lighter. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> I copied the appconfig.ini from the standard welcome app; is the >>>>>> [forms]formstyle option ignored? (bullet 2 suggests 'yes') >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> the bootstrap classes are ignored. The format of the HTML in the >>>>> bootstrap is instead important. Works with the other style options too >>>>> but >>>>> I think works best with the bootstrap html. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> Also, on the login form, the "Log In" button is appreciably smaller >>>>>> than the "Sign Up" and the "Lost Password" buttons; is that because it >>>>>> is >>>>>> an input field and the others are button buttons? >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> fixed. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> The H1 with class="glass" and contents "STUPID.CSS" has a noticeable >>>>>> band over the background picture, slightly higher than the letter >>>>>> height, >>>>>> but not the height of the enclosing DIV. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> That was on purpose. I made it smaller. is it better? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> For the quarter-div with the ADMIN stuff, it looks like I've got a >>>>>> missing glyph -- there's a rectangle about the size of the 'A' in Admin, >>>>>> with the 10-over-01 pattern that I think FF uses for missing font >>>>>> characters. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Fixed. >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Otherwise, the page looks very good! >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Did you try the grid? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> Massimo >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks! >>>>>> >>>>>> /dps >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> On Friday, 4 March 2016 08:51:00 UTC-6, villas wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I love this. It would be so cool if this was maintained with the >>>>>>>> rest of the framework and widgets could then include the generic >>>>>>>> stupid.css. The grid could use it and this would resolve a lot of >>>>>>>> issues >>>>>>>> with choice of css framework. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> A couple of questions spring to mind: >>>>>>>> Does anyone need another CSS framework! Will there be enough >>>>>>>> support to keep it going? I was reminded of the doubts I had about >>>>>>>> Markmin, but this has been great and I use it a lot and it seems to >>>>>>>> have >>>>>>>> hardly required any support or huge extra effort. I am disappointed >>>>>>>> that >>>>>>>> Markmin isn't more popular, but very glad it exists. I feel that >>>>>>>> stupid.css could be a similar kind of thing. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Is it intended that users use this for standard widgets and then >>>>>>>> add Bootstrap or Semantic or whatever for any extras? Its simplicity >>>>>>>> is >>>>>>>> not going to resolve every requirement. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I'm not convinced about the name, but at least it is memorable! >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -- Resources: - http://web2py.com - http://web2py.com/book (Documentation) - http://github.com/web2py/web2py (Source code) - https://code.google.com/p/web2py/issues/list (Report Issues) --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "web2py-users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to web2py+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
