I agree - a mainline release process would be of benefit. I think we need to look at the maturity of that google code mercurial option, as that would give us some important tools - like "code-review" per submission, so it would at least be a process...
and could lead us into what Hans mentions... On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 2:17 AM, Hans Donner <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi Massimo, > > this is perhaps also fuelled by the fact that all source/distributions > are coming from your trunk. Don't get me wrong, I think ity's very > good that yo oversee the project and keep it from straying off track. > And yes, everybody can send you patches and you says thanks in your > commits when you apply them. > > We need more visibility on this, eg like Django on > http://code.djangoproject.com/#Gettinginvolved, but also the > ticket/feature requests discussed earlier. This will create better > visibility that more people are(already) contributing. > > H > > On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 8:59 AM, mdipierro<[email protected]> wrote: > > One is that the python community still perceives web2py as a one man > > project. You people need to brag more about it and about your > > contribution. > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "web2py Web Framework" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/web2py?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
