I do not oppose a run-off if Bruno and Martin have the time to continue with the project. My guess is that the longer we drag this, the more people will lose interest but I may be wrong.
Massimo On Oct 22, 10:06 am, Jonathan Lundell <[email protected]> wrote: > On Oct 22, 2010, at 7:07 AM, Anthony wrote: > > > > > On Oct 22, 9:50 am, mdipierro <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Thanks Bruno for your hard work. > > >> Although we have to choose one (and it seems to me we have a clear > >> winner), I propose we keep some of the alternative ones (I personally > >> like 8, 14, 21, 41, 76, 87, 89, 12, 112) and we make them available > >> under an Artistic License for web2py related community sites. > > > 104 is cool too, and it might be fun to use 37 somewhere as well. > > From the point of view of a voting guy > (http://prfound.organdhttp://code.google.com/p/droop/), a quibble: the design > with the most votes got 12 of 71 votes, just under 17%. In a normal election, > we might question whether 17% of the vote yields a "clear winner". That's why > Anthony and I have been harping on the need for a more sophisticated voting > method for this kind of contest. > > My quick and unverified scan of the page turns up 69 votes, btw, not 71. If > that's right, there's a bug somewhere. Here's my list: > > 1 > 1 > 1 > 1 > 1 > 1 > 1 > 1 > 1 > 1 > 1 > 1 > 1 > 1 > 1 > 1 > 1 > 1 > 2 > 2 > 2 > 2 > 2 > 2 > 4 > 5 > 5 > 6 > 7 > 12
