71 voters is probably close to a statistically significant sample of
the we2Wpy user base, however 17 percent of that number is most
certainly not. If you want something closer to a majority I would
suggest a runoff. It won't bruise my ego if my logo doesn't make it. I
know who I would vote for and it isn't #5.
On Oct 22, 12:02 pm, Jonathan Lundell <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Oct 22, 2010, at 8:46 AM, mdipierro wrote:
>
>
>
> > I do not oppose a run-off if Bruno and Martin have the time to
> > continue with the project.
> > My guess is that the longer we drag this, the more people will lose
> > interest but I may be wrong.
>
> I'm not arguing with the choice; it's just an electoral digression.
>
> Something to consider, though, if the voting software is carried forward.
>
>
>
>
>
> > Massimo
>
> > On Oct 22, 10:06 am, Jonathan Lundell <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> On Oct 22, 2010, at 7:07 AM, Anthony wrote:
>
> >>> On Oct 22, 9:50 am, mdipierro <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>>> Thanks Bruno for your hard work.
>
> >>>> Although we have to choose one (and it seems to me we have a clear
> >>>> winner), I propose we keep some of the alternative ones (I personally
> >>>> like 8, 14, 21, 41, 76, 87, 89, 12, 112) and we make them available
> >>>> under an Artistic License for web2py related community sites.
>
> >>> 104 is cool too, and it might be fun to use 37 somewhere as well.
>
> >> From the point of view of a voting guy
> >> (http://prfound.organdhttp://code.google.com/p/droop/), a quibble: the
> >> design with the most votes got 12 of 71 votes, just under 17%. In a normal
> >> election, we might question whether 17% of the vote yields a "clear
> >> winner". That's why Anthony and I have been harping on the need for a more
> >> sophisticated voting method for this kind of contest.
>
> >> My quick and unverified scan of the page turns up 69 votes, btw, not 71.
> >> If that's right, there's a bug somewhere. Here's my list:
>
> >> 1
> >> 1
> >> 1
> >> 1
> >> 1
> >> 1
> >> 1
> >> 1
> >> 1
> >> 1
> >> 1
> >> 1
> >> 1
> >> 1
> >> 1
> >> 1
> >> 1
> >> 1
> >> 2
> >> 2
> >> 2
> >> 2
> >> 2
> >> 2
> >> 4
> >> 5
> >> 5
> >> 6
> >> 7
> >> 12
