Il giorno 19/nov/2010, alle ore 13.59, John Kim ha scritto: > Oh, also I was just reading about Web2Py support on Cherokee via > uWSGI: > - http://web2pyslices.com/main/slices/take_slice/64 > - > http://groups.google.com/group/web2py/browse_thread/thread/5213ca17c3352c2e/221cebcfa01609b1?#221cebcfa01609b1 > It's not mentioned in the official book, yet. Is uWSGI officially > supported? > > I was wondering how it compares to FastCGI: > - uWSGI seems faster > - however some people ran into issues using uWSGI; were those > resolved? > > John-Kim > >
The only issue with Cherokee+uWSGI is on the Cherokee-wizard that does not support most of the new uWSGI features. (but this will be obviously fixed soon) If you configure manually the whole stack (as you would do with other webservers) there are no known issue. Here there is a list of (updated) example for web2py http://projects.unbit.it/uwsgi/wiki/Example#Web2Py2uWSGI (the links you posted are a bit outdated and over-complex) -- Roberto De Ioris http://unbit.it
