As long as it's not Affero GPL, they really have nothing to worry about. I acutally like GPL more than BSD and other crap. Viral licenses are much better for upstream.
On Sat, Dec 11, 2010 at 5:17 PM, mdipierro <mdipie...@cs.depaul.edu> wrote: > are you talking about the web2py license? Why would a client care? > Web2py imposes no restriction on their code. I an write a letter to > this effect if at all necessary. > > Massimo > > On Dec 11, 10:11 am, "G. Clifford Williams" <g...@notadiscussion.com> > wrote: >> I hope so. A different license would certainly help with my fight for >> adoption by a few clients >> >> On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 06:31:15PM -0800, pbreit spake: >> >> > Did I read correctly that you might evaluate Web2py's license? It does >> > seem like GPL could potentially discourage usage since it makes the >> > code harder to modify. That might be why very few frameworks are GPL: >> >http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_web_application_frameworks >> >> -- Branko Vukelić bg.bra...@gmail.com stu...@brankovukelic.com Check out my blog: http://www.brankovukelic.com/ Check out my portfolio: http://www.flickr.com/photos/foxbunny/ Registered Linux user #438078 (http://counter.li.org/) I hang out on identi.ca: http://identi.ca/foxbunny Gimp Brushmakers Guild http://bit.ly/gbg-group
