On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 6:59 AM, Barros Pena, Belen < [email protected]> wrote:
> I am not even sure if need to produce Web Hob documentation for the 1.5 > release, but I thought I'd bring it up just in case. Maybe something > lightweight, like the Hob manual page on the website, might be enough. > > Let me know what you think. > Is Webhob to be a part of BitBake proper? I see that Webhob patches are hitting the bitbake-devel list. If the answer is yes, that Webhob is to be a part of BitBake and it's source code live within the BitBake source tree, then my feeling is that it's documentation should be part of the BitBake manual. > > Belén > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > Intel Corporation (UK) Limited > Registered No. 1134945 (England) > Registered Office: Pipers Way, Swindon SN3 1RJ > VAT No: 860 2173 47 > > This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for > the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution > by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended > recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies. > > _______________________________________________ > webhob mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/webhob >
_______________________________________________ webhob mailing list [email protected] https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/webhob
