Right now we have a small section in the dev-manual that is called "Image Development Using Hob". It introduces Hob as a method to develop images, states it is UI-driven, and tells how you can set it up and invoke it. It references our Hob page on the website. The section also highlights and lists the main functions that you can do using Hob. So I think what you are saying needs to be in the YP docs already exists.
Scott >-----Original Message----- >From: Richard Purdie [mailto:[email protected]] >Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2013 4:38 AM >To: Bill Traynor >Cc: Barros Pena, Belen; Paul Eggleton; Rifenbark, Scott M; >[email protected] >Subject: Re: [Webhob] Web Hob documentation? > >On Thu, 2013-06-13 at 07:23 -0400, Bill Traynor wrote: >> On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 6:59 AM, Barros Pena, Belen >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> I am not even sure if need to produce Web Hob documentation >> for the 1.5 >> release, but I thought I'd bring it up just in case. Maybe >> something >> lightweight, like the Hob manual page on the website, might be >> enough. >> >> Let me know what you think. >> >> Is Webhob to be a part of BitBake proper? I see that Webhob patches >> are hitting the bitbake-devel list. If the answer is yes, that Webhob >> is to be a part of BitBake and it's source code live within the >> BitBake source tree, then my feeling is that it's documentation should >> be part of the BitBake manual. > >I think the answer is "it depends". I think for 1.5 we will need some >basic information about the fact the UI exists, how to start it, what >the capabilities are, the limitations and some indication of future >plans (high level). This would probably be fine in the YP manuals and/or >on the wiki. If we do add any developer oriented docs such as how to >extend/customise it, those would probably be best in the bitbake manual. > >Cheers, > >Richard > > _______________________________________________ webhob mailing list [email protected] https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/webhob
