On Thu, 2013-06-13 at 07:23 -0400, Bill Traynor wrote: > On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 6:59 AM, Barros Pena, Belen > <[email protected]> wrote: > I am not even sure if need to produce Web Hob documentation > for the 1.5 > release, but I thought I'd bring it up just in case. Maybe > something > lightweight, like the Hob manual page on the website, might be > enough. > > Let me know what you think. > > Is Webhob to be a part of BitBake proper? I see that Webhob patches > are hitting the bitbake-devel list. If the answer is yes, that Webhob > is to be a part of BitBake and it's source code live within the > BitBake source tree, then my feeling is that it's documentation should > be part of the BitBake manual.
I think the answer is "it depends". I think for 1.5 we will need some basic information about the fact the UI exists, how to start it, what the capabilities are, the limitations and some indication of future plans (high level). This would probably be fine in the YP manuals and/or on the wiki. If we do add any developer oriented docs such as how to extend/customise it, those would probably be best in the bitbake manual. Cheers, Richard _______________________________________________ webhob mailing list [email protected] https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/webhob
