Hi Maciej.
Cameron McCormack:
> > If possible, it would be nice if there could be some degree of
> > compatibility between this proposed API and the one in SVG Tiny 1.2:
> >
> > http://dev.w3.org/SVG/profiles/1.2T/publish/svgudom.html#svg__SVGTimer
Maciej Stachowiak:
> I considered that, but I don't like the fact that it makes the common
> zero-delay continuation callback case into three lines of code instead
> of one, for what I think is no practical benefit.
Justin’s proposed API seems to need four lines for that case:
var t = new Timer();
t.repeatCount = 1;
t.addEventListener('timercomplete', function() { … }, false);
t.start();
compared with the three for SVG’s timer:
var t = createTimer(0, -1);
t.addEventListener('SVGTimer', function() { … }, false);
t.start();
Or do you mean compared to a simple function-like API, such as
setTimeout(), where it can be done in one line? (Perhaps functions like
setHighResolution{Interval,Timeout}() would be easiest then.)
--
Cameron McCormack ≝ http://mcc.id.au/
_______________________________________________
webkit-dev mailing list
webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org
http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev
