Reviewed more before bed. We're down to: https://bugs.webkit.org/buglist.cgi?field0-0-0=flagtypes.name&type0-0-0=equals&value0-0-0=review%3F 50
and curl -s "https://bugs.webkit.org/request.cgi" | grep PDT | wc -l 61 respectively. Still awful, but much much better than yesterday. -eric On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 7:40 PM, Maciej Stachowiak <m...@apple.com> wrote: > > On May 22, 2009, at 2:19 AM, Eric Seidel wrote: > >> Update: We're down to 74 patches now. >> >> Thanks especially to Maciej for all his reviewing this evening: >> >> curl -s "https://bugs.webkit.org/request.cgi" | grep PDT | wc -l] >> 74 >> >> Still a long way to go. > > FWIW I prefer this query, which counts by bug and gives a count of 57: > > https://bugs.webkit.org/buglist.cgi?field0-0-0=flagtypes.name&type0-0-0=equals&value0-0-0=review%3F > > It looks like about half the remaining bugs are Qt or Gtk specific, and > likely need someone who is expert on those ports to look at them. I don't > feel comfortable reviewing things that affect Qt or Gtk APIs especially. > > - Maciej > >> >> >> -eric >> >> On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 12:27 PM, Eric Seidel <e...@webkit.org> wrote: >>> >>> Our review process seems to be failing. As a reviewer, let me extend >>> my apologies to the WebKit community as I am part of this failure. >>> >>> We have over 100 patches in the review queue at the moment: >>> http://webkit.org/pending-review >>> >>> I've started going through the list and reviewing what patches I can. >>> I'm also marking r- all patches I can't review which have had no >>> comments in the last 2 weeks. >>> >>> -eric >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> webkit-dev mailing list >> webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org >> http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev > > _______________________________________________ webkit-dev mailing list webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev