Ok, I agree that a sectioned queue would help. There is no need to see the Gtk patches in the list: https://bugs.webkit.org/buglist.cgi?field0-0-0=flagtypes.name&type0-0-0=equals&value0-0-0=review%3F (which is back up to 40, btw!)
But we should be able to keep "core" (nearly) empty if it were kept separate. -eric On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 11:22 PM, Eric Seidel<e...@webkit.org> wrote: > We're down to 30 bugs: > https://bugs.webkit.org/buglist.cgi?field0-0-0=flagtypes.name&type0-0-0=equals&value0-0-0=review%3F > > With 36 patches total: > curl -s "https://bugs.webkit.org/request.cgi" | grep PDT | wc -l > > 15 of those are Gtk-only bugs. Need some help from the Gtk reviewers > on this one. > > Thanks again to those who have pitched in so far. > > -eric > > On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 12:20 AM, Eric Seidel <e...@webkit.org> wrote: >> Reviewed more before bed. We're down to: >> >> https://bugs.webkit.org/buglist.cgi?field0-0-0=flagtypes.name&type0-0-0=equals&value0-0-0=review%3F >> 50 >> >> and >> >> curl -s "https://bugs.webkit.org/request.cgi" | grep PDT | wc -l >> 61 >> >> respectively. >> >> Still awful, but much much better than yesterday. >> >> -eric >> >> On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 7:40 PM, Maciej Stachowiak <m...@apple.com> wrote: >>> >>> On May 22, 2009, at 2:19 AM, Eric Seidel wrote: >>> >>>> Update: We're down to 74 patches now. >>>> >>>> Thanks especially to Maciej for all his reviewing this evening: >>>> >>>> curl -s "https://bugs.webkit.org/request.cgi" | grep PDT | wc -l] >>>> 74 >>>> >>>> Still a long way to go. >>> >>> FWIW I prefer this query, which counts by bug and gives a count of 57: >>> >>> https://bugs.webkit.org/buglist.cgi?field0-0-0=flagtypes.name&type0-0-0=equals&value0-0-0=review%3F >>> >>> It looks like about half the remaining bugs are Qt or Gtk specific, and >>> likely need someone who is expert on those ports to look at them. I don't >>> feel comfortable reviewing things that affect Qt or Gtk APIs especially. >>> >>> - Maciej >>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -eric >>>> >>>> On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 12:27 PM, Eric Seidel <e...@webkit.org> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Our review process seems to be failing. As a reviewer, let me extend >>>>> my apologies to the WebKit community as I am part of this failure. >>>>> >>>>> We have over 100 patches in the review queue at the moment: >>>>> http://webkit.org/pending-review >>>>> >>>>> I've started going through the list and reviewing what patches I can. >>>>> I'm also marking r- all patches I can't review which have had no >>>>> comments in the last 2 weeks. >>>>> >>>>> -eric >>>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> webkit-dev mailing list >>>> webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org >>>> http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev >>> >>> >> > _______________________________________________ webkit-dev mailing list webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev