On Thursday, July 9, 2009 11:06:58 AM, Maciej Stachowiak wrote: >On Jul 9, 2009, at 4:33 AM, David Kilzer wrote: > >>* What does the format look like for bugs with multiple URL >>links, e.g., to <rdar://problem/NNNNNNN> or to >><http://crbug.com/NNNNN>? (The title should not have to be >>repeated--you should be fixing the same issue for all of them.) > >I could think of two reasonable options? > > <http://webkit.org/b/27098><rdar://problem/12345> Make prepare-ChangeLog > less shouty > Reviewed by Mark Rowe. > > > <http://webkit.org/b/27098> Make prepare-ChangeLog less shouty > <rdar://problem/7123456> > Reviewed by Mark Rowe. > >Preferences?
#2 please. >>* Is the "Reviewed by" line going to have a blank line above it? >> (I think it should, but I could be persuaded otherwise.) > >I don't think it should, if it's one of two special lines at the >top. Otherwise the whole ChangeLog entry looks double-spaced and >gets harder to read. Yeah, I've noticed that. >>And from The-World-is-Not-Enough Department: >> >>* The commit-log-editor should be smart about condensing >>duplicate content after the date-name-email lines for each >>ChangeLog entry, and it should move those lines to the top of >>the commit message. (This also makes git users happy since the >>first line would be the bug URL and description, making >>"git log --oneline" more useful.) > >I'm not sure I understand this suggestion. An illustrated example of pulling common lines out of each subsection (with double-spacing): http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/44095 http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/44096 Dave _______________________________________________ webkit-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev
