Would one of you mind filing a bug and CCing fishd and dglazkov?

-eric

On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 12:02 PM, Adam Barth <[email protected]> wrote:
> That sounds like a bug to me.  Historically the chromium port hasn't
> had a strong distinction between WebKit and WebCore/platform, but I
> think it's a worthwhile distinction to make.
>
> Adam
>
>
> On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 11:53 AM, Oliver Hunt <[email protected]> wrote:
>> I just noticed that there are a bunch of WebCore platform implementations
>> being landed in Chrome's WebKit API rather than in WebCore/platform.  This
>> seems incorrect to me as there is no other place where this sort of
>> mis-layering occurred, the obvious files that stand out are:
>>
>> ApplicationCacheHost.cpp
>> GraphicsContext3D.cpp
>> MediaPlayerPrivateChromium.cpp
>> PlatformMessagePortChannel.*
>> ResoureHandle.cpp
>> DOMUtilitiesPrivate.*
>>
>> I see no obvious reason for these being placed in WebKit -- as far as I can
>> tell these represent a layering violation: it's not possible to build the
>> WebCore directory into it's own library due to the hard dependency on the
>> chrome webkit 'api'.
>>
>> --Oliver
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> webkit-dev mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev
>>
> _______________________________________________
> webkit-dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev
>
_______________________________________________
webkit-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev

Reply via email to