On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 12:44 PM, Ryosuke Niwa <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 12:37 PM, Dirk Pranke <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> I have no objection either to increasing the defaults for either of >> these numbers or making it possible to have different defaults per >> port. >> >> Do you want to suggest different defaults? Should we use ORWT's >> (infinite failures and infinite crashes by default)? > > > Unbounded failures & crashes sound good to me although I can definitely see > a value in passing some fixed value on bots so as to reduce the cycle time > when 10,000+ tests start to crash. Something like 100, 300, or 500 would > probably be acceptable. >
NRWT defaults to 500 failures, so you're suggesting we just up the default # of crashes to 500? Anyone have any other numbers jumping out at them? -- Dirk _______________________________________________ webkit-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev
