On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 12:46 PM, Dirk Pranke <dpra...@chromium.org> wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 12:44 PM, Ryosuke Niwa <rn...@webkit.org> wrote: > > On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 12:37 PM, Dirk Pranke <dpra...@chromium.org> > wrote: > >> > >> I have no objection either to increasing the defaults for either of > >> these numbers or making it possible to have different defaults per > >> port. > >> > >> Do you want to suggest different defaults? Should we use ORWT's > >> (infinite failures and infinite crashes by default)? > > > > > > Unbounded failures & crashes sound good to me although I can definitely > see > > a value in passing some fixed value on bots so as to reduce the cycle > time > > when 10,000+ tests start to crash. Something like 100, 300, or 500 would > > probably be acceptable. > > > > NRWT defaults to 500 failures, so you're suggesting we just up the > default # of crashes to 500? Anyone have any other numbers jumping out > at them? > I'm OK with the ORWT defaults of infinite for both. Then we never have to have this discussion again. :) It can be on the buildbot maintainers to pass in the right flags. All of the non-chromium ports already do anyways as best I can tell.
_______________________________________________ webkit-dev mailing list webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev
