On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 1:38 PM, Ojan Vafai <o...@chromium.org> wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 12:46 PM, Dirk Pranke <dpra...@chromium.org> wrote: > >> On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 12:44 PM, Ryosuke Niwa <rn...@webkit.org> wrote: >> > On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 12:37 PM, Dirk Pranke <dpra...@chromium.org> >> wrote: >> >> >> >> I have no objection either to increasing the defaults for either of >> >> these numbers or making it possible to have different defaults per >> >> port. >> >> >> >> Do you want to suggest different defaults? Should we use ORWT's >> >> (infinite failures and infinite crashes by default)? >> > >> > >> > Unbounded failures & crashes sound good to me although I can definitely >> see >> > a value in passing some fixed value on bots so as to reduce the cycle >> time >> > when 10,000+ tests start to crash. Something like 100, 300, or 500 would >> > probably be acceptable. >> > >> >> NRWT defaults to 500 failures, so you're suggesting we just up the >> default # of crashes to 500? Anyone have any other numbers jumping out >> at them? >> > > I'm OK with the ORWT defaults of infinite for both. Then we never have to > have this discussion again. :) It can be on the buildbot maintainers to > pass in the right flags. All of the non-chromium ports already do anyways > as best I can tell. > That's an argument I can buy. - Ryosuke
_______________________________________________ webkit-dev mailing list webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev
