On Apr 8, 2013, at 11:19 AM, Michelangelo De Simone <micde...@gmail.com> wrote:
> [Moved/Reposted to WebKit-Dev] > > On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 11:08 AM, Ryosuke Niwa <rn...@chromium.org> wrote: > >>> What about adding a "NeedsOwner" keyword to orphan feature bugs, >>> marking them RESOLVED/LATER? >> >> I would be resistent to add such a keyword given there is no official >> "owner" for any feature in WebKit. > > Call it however you like, it was just an example (appropriate > candidate might also be "NeedsPeceAndLove"); the idea is to track > orphan features that might be appealing to contributors seeking > opportunities and to give them at least some advantage in taking over. I don't think we should mark bugs resolved if the code is still in WebKit, the bug is not fixed, and we'd accept a fix. If we're looking for volunteers to hack on particular areas, I think a wiki page seeking volunteers is likely more effective. Regards, Maciej
_______________________________________________ webkit-dev mailing list webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org https://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo/webkit-dev
