We could do that, or add some JS hack to Bugzilla so that it hides EWS
comments by default but makes them expandable.

- R. Niwa


On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 8:09 PM, Sam Weinig <wei...@apple.com> wrote:

> Could we compromise for now, and remove all the non-test failing EWS
> comments (e.g. build failure, style failure)?
>
> - Sam
>
> On Jan 15, 2014, at 8:04 PM, Ryosuke Niwa <rn...@webkit.org> wrote:
>
> I find Mac EWS's listing the failing tests to be very useful especially
> because it uploads the results to Bugzilla.
>
> I do agree that comments about build failures are much less useful.
>
> - R. Niwa
>
>
> On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 7:54 PM, Sam Weinig <wei...@apple.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Everyone,
>>
>> I am becoming increasingly annoyed by the comments made in
>> bugs.webkit.org bugs by our non-human helpers, the EWS bots.  I don’t
>> find the addition of a comment indicating that a patch has failed on a bot,
>> over the existing indication in the bubble, to be worth the noise it
>> creates.
>>
>> I propose that we stop allowing the bots to comment, and leave that space
>> for the developers.
>>
>> - Sam
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> webkit-dev mailing list
>> webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org
>> https://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo/webkit-dev
>>
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
webkit-dev mailing list
webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org
https://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo/webkit-dev

Reply via email to