It isn't just about seeing the comment on the page, it also gets emailed. I agree, no bot comments would be better. The stye bot spew is particularly bad, mainly because it dumps all the file paths it tested not just what fails.
— Timothy Hatcher On Jan 15, 2014, at 8:17 PM, Ryosuke Niwa <rn...@webkit.org> wrote: > We could do that, or add some JS hack to Bugzilla so that it hides EWS > comments by default but makes them expandable. > > - R. Niwa > > > On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 8:09 PM, Sam Weinig <wei...@apple.com> wrote: > Could we compromise for now, and remove all the non-test failing EWS comments > (e.g. build failure, style failure)? > > - Sam > > On Jan 15, 2014, at 8:04 PM, Ryosuke Niwa <rn...@webkit.org> wrote: > >> I find Mac EWS's listing the failing tests to be very useful especially >> because it uploads the results to Bugzilla. >> >> I do agree that comments about build failures are much less useful. >> >> - R. Niwa >> >> >> On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 7:54 PM, Sam Weinig <wei...@apple.com> wrote: >> Hi Everyone, >> >> I am becoming increasingly annoyed by the comments made in bugs.webkit.org >> bugs by our non-human helpers, the EWS bots. I don’t find the addition of a >> comment indicating that a patch has failed on a bot, over the existing >> indication in the bubble, to be worth the noise it creates. >> >> I propose that we stop allowing the bots to comment, and leave that space >> for the developers. >> >> - Sam >> >> _______________________________________________ >> webkit-dev mailing list >> webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org >> https://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo/webkit-dev >> > > > _______________________________________________ > webkit-dev mailing list > webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org > https://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo/webkit-dev
_______________________________________________ webkit-dev mailing list webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org https://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo/webkit-dev
