El dom, 23-04-2017 a las 22:12 -0700, Brady Eidson escribió: > > On Apr 22, 2017, at 6:21 AM, Michael Catanzaro <mcatanzaro@igalia.c > > om> wrote: > > > > I think Carlos's plan to reuse the non-GTK+ bits of the GTK+ API > > would be much better for us. > > I as long as the GTK and WPE ports like this plan (it appears they > both are) and are both committed to see it to fruition (it appears > they both are), then I fully support this. > > I do *not* support adding another client of the C API, even in the > interim.
It would be easier for us to move to the new API after the port is upstream, since it will require refactorings in both ports GTK+ and WPE . So, we can simply remove from the current patch anything added to the C API (except the web view implementation or whatever is needed by WTR) and then work on moving to the new API in follow up patches. Are you ok with that? > Thanks, > ~Brady > > _______________________________________________ > webkit-dev mailing list > webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org > https://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo/webkit-dev > _______________________________________________ webkit-dev mailing list webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org https://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo/webkit-dev
