> On Apr 24, 2017, at 2:31 AM, Carlos Garcia Campos <cgar...@igalia.com> wrote: > > El dom, 23-04-2017 a las 22:12 -0700, Brady Eidson escribió: >>> On Apr 22, 2017, at 6:21 AM, Michael Catanzaro <mcatanzaro@igalia.c >>> om> wrote: >>> >>> I think Carlos's plan to reuse the non-GTK+ bits of the GTK+ API >>> would be much better for us. >> >> I as long as the GTK and WPE ports like this plan (it appears they >> both are) and are both committed to see it to fruition (it appears >> they both are), then I fully support this. >> >> I do *not* support adding another client of the C API, even in the >> interim. > > It would be easier for us to move to the new API after the port is > upstream, since it will require refactorings in both ports GTK+ and WPE > . So, we can simply remove from the current patch anything added to the > C API (except the web view implementation or whatever is needed by WTR) > and then work on moving to the new API in follow up patches. > > Are you ok with that?
In the coming weeks I am actually likely to be changing and/or removing at least a few functions from the C-API. As long as the WPE upstreaming effort is comfortable with the idea that I might be breaking them as they go… That’s fine. Thanks, ~Brady _______________________________________________ webkit-dev mailing list webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org https://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo/webkit-dev
