Absolutely!
My response was regarding Apple advertising WO, which will never
happen. I am totally in favor of community advocacy, and think we
can do an awesome job of it.
On Aug 13, 2006, at 8:38 AM, Marc Oesch wrote:
Hello,
- ask Apple to give WebObjects the same status it gives the rest
of the
product line
Ah - you've hit the nail right on the head. WebObjects is no
longer a
product, it is a development tool. Do you ever see ads for
CoreData or
CoreImage?
Completely agree with you.
- But few updated links to community sites
from http://www.apple.com/webobjects/resources.html
- and a few updated showcases should be possible for a developer
tool, no ?
For people new on the list, you can pull an old snap from the WO
page with an example of a PDF about the "US navy using WO... " on the
right side...
http://web.archive.org/web/20020802115809/www.apple.com/webobjects/
A similar showcase in 2006 on the iTunes Music Store and/or the Apple
Store would
certainly help in case someone from Apple is reading this list :)
Anyway,my summary opinion is to have Apple provide the minimum (ie.
links) so the community can move forward on its own sites without
waiting for Godot :)
Marc
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
This email sent to archive@mail-archive.com
