On 2011-08-24, at 7:49 AM, John Huss wrote: > On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 9:17 AM, Chuck Hill <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 2011-08-24, at 1:40 AM, Paul Dunkler wrote: > > > Hi out there, > > > > we a re currently facing problems with our WebObjects deployment which has > > grown very much in the last time. > > The problem is, that we want to connect more than 16 Servers to the > > Adaptor, which is not possible because the adaptor has an hard-coded limit > > on 16 app-servers. > > > > Is there anyone out there which such a big deployment? What is your > > solution for handling this problem? > > One possibility would be compiling the adaptor myself and setting the > > hard-coded limit to 20 or some, but i thank that is not really the right > > way. > > I think that is what people usually do. > > So why is the limit 16 by default then? Just curious...
WebObjects is full of curious defaults. :-) Maybe back when this was originally written, millennia ago, that was all one Apache server could handle? Maybe they thought "16 servers is more than enough for anyone!". Chuck -- Chuck Hill Senior Consultant / VP Development Practical WebObjects - for developers who want to increase their overall knowledge of WebObjects or who are trying to solve specific problems. http://www.global-village.net/products/practical_webobjects _______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Webobjects-dev mailing list ([email protected]) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com This email sent to [email protected]
