Nobody cares about WOnder anymore? You feeling OK Pascal? On Feb 5, 2015, at 4:11 PM, Pascal Robert <prob...@macti.ca> wrote:
> I guess it will be in the not-very-open TreasureBoard. Nobody cares about > Wonder anymore. > > ----- Mail original ----- > De: "Daniel D CIV NAVAIR Beatty, 474300D" <daniel.bea...@navy.mil> > À: "webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com" <webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com> > Envoyé: Jeudi 5 Février 2015 16:07:11 > Objet: RE: [OT] .Net goes Open Source > > Hi gang, > I seem to remember talk amongst the project wonder gang that we might > actually refactor Wonder to use a pseudo-web-objects. If looks like WO, > smells like WO, but legally not WO could Wonder be the owner? > > V/R, > > Daniel Beatty, Ph.D., > IEEE Certified Software Development Professional (CSDP) > Computer Scientist > Code 474300D > 1 Administration Circle. M/S 1109 > China Lake, CA 93555 > daniel.bea...@navy.mil > (760)939-7097 > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: webobjects-dev-bounces+daniel.beatty=navy....@lists.apple.com > [mailto:webobjects-dev-bounces+daniel.beatty=navy....@lists.apple.com] On > Behalf Of Troy Lumasag > Sent: Wednesday, February 04, 2015 10:15 PM > To: webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com > Subject: Re: [OT] .Net goes Open Source > > Hey guys, > > What really are the problems - direct, impending or long term problems being > as it is now? > I can recall these stated problems if I understood it correct: > 1. porting issues(moving to future java versions) 2. single-threaded editing > context <- Must be a bottleneck problem for multiple instance setup? > > Sorry if I'm being naive on my question haha > > --Troy > > On 2/5/2015 11:55 AM, Timothy Worman wrote: >> WebObjects is one of Apple’s weapons - it helps them be fluid and quick - >> especially with the devs they have. Maybe open sourcing WO seems threatening >> because it is a internal business advantage. >> >> Tim Worman >> UCLA GSE&IS >> >>> On Feb 4, 2015, at 4:59 PM, OC <o...@ocs.cz> wrote: >>> >>> On 5. 2. 2015, at 1:42, Hugi Thordarson <h...@karlmenn.is> wrote: >>>> Apple cares about money, not us. >>> Oh, absolutely! Given the zilliards Apple charges for WebObjects >>> licences... oh, wait. >>> >>> Actually I just don't get it -- for long long years I don't get it at all. >>> >>> (i) first, they seriously cripple the world's best web application >>> framework by cutting out the ObjC support, leaving it Java-only, and thus >>> half-unusable. >>> >>> (ii) then they stop bundling it. >>> >>> (iii) then they stop supporting it at all. >>> >>> All right, I can see after (i) they could hardly charge any money for >>> licencing, whilst the support price would skyrocket; but why on earth not >>> put it to open source at the same moment?!? >>> >>> The same company who is known to put _lots_ of pretty interesting things to >>> public (see Darwin). >>> >>> Oh, sigh. >>> >>> About the only (dumb and conspirational) theory I can think of is >>> that were the sources open, hacking App Store would get the usual >>> 'varsity freaks pastime :) >>> >>>> - hugi >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>> http://blogs.msdn.com/b/dotnet/archive/2015/02/03/coreclr-is-now-op >>>>> en-source.aspx >>>>> >>>>> The github is here >>>>> >>>>> https://github.com/dotnet/coreclr >>>>> >>>>> It’s a shame Apple never did the same with WO. >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. >>>> Webobjects-dev mailing list (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com) >>>> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: >>>> https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/ocs%40ocs.cz >>>> >>>> This email sent to o...@ocs.cz >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. >>> Webobjects-dev mailing list (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com) >>> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: >>> https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/lists%40thetim >>> my.com >>> >>> This email sent to li...@thetimmy.com >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. >> Webobjects-dev mailing list (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com) >> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: >> https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/tlumasag%40gmai >> l.com >> >> This email sent to tluma...@gmail.com > > _______________________________________________ > Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. > Webobjects-dev mailing list (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com) > Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: > https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/daniel.beatty%40navy.mil > > This email sent to daniel.bea...@navy.mil > > _______________________________________________ > Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. > Webobjects-dev mailing list (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com) > Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: > https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/probert%40macti.ca > > This email sent to prob...@macti.ca > > _______________________________________________ > Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. > Webobjects-dev mailing list (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com) > Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: > https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/kenlists%40anderhome.com > > This email sent to kenli...@anderhome.com
_______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Webobjects-dev mailing list (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com This email sent to arch...@mail-archive.com
