I think he means there have not been a lot of new additions or work done on it lately.
On 2015-02-05, 1:13 PM, "Ken Anderson" wrote: Nobody cares about WOnder anymore? You feeling OK Pascal? On Feb 5, 2015, at 4:11 PM, Pascal Robert <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: I guess it will be in the not-very-open TreasureBoard. Nobody cares about Wonder anymore. ----- Mail original ----- De: "Daniel D CIV NAVAIR Beatty, 474300D" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> À: "[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Envoyé: Jeudi 5 Février 2015 16:07:11 Objet: RE: [OT] .Net goes Open Source Hi gang, I seem to remember talk amongst the project wonder gang that we might actually refactor Wonder to use a pseudo-web-objects. If looks like WO, smells like WO, but legally not WO could Wonder be the owner? V/R, Daniel Beatty, Ph.D., IEEE Certified Software Development Professional (CSDP) Computer Scientist Code 474300D 1 Administration Circle. M/S 1109 China Lake, CA 93555 [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> (760)939-7097 -----Original Message----- From: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Troy Lumasag Sent: Wednesday, February 04, 2015 10:15 PM To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Subject: Re: [OT] .Net goes Open Source Hey guys, What really are the problems - direct, impending or long term problems being as it is now? I can recall these stated problems if I understood it correct: 1. porting issues(moving to future java versions) 2. single-threaded editing context <- Must be a bottleneck problem for multiple instance setup? Sorry if I'm being naive on my question haha --Troy On 2/5/2015 11:55 AM, Timothy Worman wrote: WebObjects is one of Apple’s weapons - it helps them be fluid and quick - especially with the devs they have. Maybe open sourcing WO seems threatening because it is a internal business advantage. Tim Worman UCLA GSE&IS On Feb 4, 2015, at 4:59 PM, OC <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: On 5. 2. 2015, at 1:42, Hugi Thordarson <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Apple cares about money, not us. Oh, absolutely! Given the zilliards Apple charges for WebObjects licences... oh, wait. Actually I just don't get it -- for long long years I don't get it at all. (i) first, they seriously cripple the world's best web application framework by cutting out the ObjC support, leaving it Java-only, and thus half-unusable. (ii) then they stop bundling it. (iii) then they stop supporting it at all. All right, I can see after (i) they could hardly charge any money for licencing, whilst the support price would skyrocket; but why on earth not put it to open source at the same moment?!? The same company who is known to put _lots_ of pretty interesting things to public (see Darwin). Oh, sigh. About the only (dumb and conspirational) theory I can think of is that were the sources open, hacking App Store would get the usual 'varsity freaks pastime :) - hugi http://blogs.msdn.com/b/dotnet/archive/2015/02/03/coreclr-is-now-op en-source.aspx The github is here https://github.com/dotnet/coreclr It’s a shame Apple never did the same with WO. _______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Webobjects-dev mailing list ([email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/ocs%40ocs.cz This email sent to [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> _______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Webobjects-dev mailing list ([email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/lists%40thetim my.com This email sent to [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> _______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Webobjects-dev mailing list ([email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/tlumasag%40gmai l.com This email sent to [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> _______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Webobjects-dev mailing list ([email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/daniel.beatty%40navy.mil This email sent to [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> _______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Webobjects-dev mailing list ([email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/probert%40macti.ca This email sent to [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> _______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Webobjects-dev mailing list ([email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/kenlists%40anderhome.com This email sent to [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
_______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Webobjects-dev mailing list ([email protected]) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com This email sent to [email protected]
