Both packagings of WO are identical. It just depends on if you want a legacy (framework) or modern (jar) deployment.
Did you add it as “WebObjects Frameworks” library, or some other way? I am wondering if your project setup is not correct for a WO project. From: "Ress, David A" <[email protected]> Date: Thursday, May 19, 2016 at 11:34 AM To: Chuck Hill <[email protected]> Cc: WebObjects-Dev <[email protected]> Subject: Re: Class Main exists but is not a subcomponent of WOComponent > ~/WebObjects.properties are optional, user specific properties. It is from > WO/Wonder, not Eclipse. Good to know, I need to remember this one (for a while I thought something had matured since my last upgrade) > The second is in because you have WO installed both as jar bundles and > framework bundles. It is just letting you know it is loading the jar > versions. Again, good to know and that it is not a bad thing. Is there an advantage to having both? one or the other? > How are you including your custom framework in the application? Within Eclipse for building I have it as a library in in the Java Build Path. For running from within Eclipse, it is installed in the Local Frameworks directory on the computer "/Development/Libraries/WOnder/Library/Frameworks".
_______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Webobjects-dev mailing list ([email protected]) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com This email sent to [email protected]
