One other comment. The only downside to this is that it restricts the search string the user can type to a specific attribute instead of the broader concatenated representation which provided a “fuzzier” search. And obviously, requires communication with the user about what they can expect to return matching results.
Tim > On Oct 7, 2016, at 11:54 AM, T Worman <li...@thetimmy.com> wrote: > > Fabian: > > Nice! That rule did the trick. Thanks for responding - kept me from having to > dig more. So, I have two rules now that look like: > > 100 : smartRelationship.destinationEntity.name = ‘Product' => > keyWhenRelationship = "d2wProductDisplayWhenRelationship" > [com.webobjects.directtoweb.Assignment] > 100 : smartRelationship.destinationEntity.name = ‘Product' => searchKey = > “productNumber" [com.webobjects.directtoweb.Assignment] > > Where ‘d2wProductDisplayWhenRelationship’ is a method that returns a nice > user-readable string for the objects in the search results. > > Thanks for the assist! > > Tim > UCLA GSE&IS > >> On Oct 6, 2016, at 11:03 PM, Fabian Peters <lists.fab...@e-lumo.com> wrote: >> >> Hi Tim, >> >> ERMD2WEditToOneTypeAhead got a few changes from me, including one to use the >> ERMD2WAttributeQueryDelegate. The change aimed to preserve the original >> behaviour, but looking at the code it may be that it doesn't when the data >> source being used is an EODatabaseDataSource. >> >> Using a rule like this should sort it out at any rate: >> >> 100 : smartRelationship.destinationEntity.name = 'Product' => searchKey = >> "productNumber" [com.webobjects.directtoweb.Assignment] >> >> If it does, I'd still like to have another look at why the default behaviour >> is not being preserved… >> >> Fabian >> >>> Am 06.10.2016 um 23:56 schrieb T Worman <li...@thetimmy.com>: >>> >>> Hello All: >>> >>> I have a relationship sth like: >>> >>> Product(productId) <-> LineItem(productId) >>> >>> I am using ERMD2WEditToOneTypeAhead on the attribute Product.productNumber >>> on a CreateLineItem page. But I’ve also got a rule for keyWhenRelationship >>> like: >>> >>> 100 : smartRelationship.destinationEntity.name = ‘Product' => >>> keyWhenRelationship = "d2wProductDisplayWhenRelationship" >>> [com.webobjects.directtoweb.Assignment] >>> >>> where Product.d2wProductDisplayWhenRelationship returns a concatenated >>> string that gives a more complete description of the product. Previously, >>> this worked to only display items where Product.productNumber matched the >>> string inserted by the user. Now it only works correctly if >>> keyWhenRelationship=productNumber. The problem with this is that it doesn’t >>> give the user enough feedback about the search results. >>> >>> Also, the behavior I’m seeing is that a whole list of Product objects are >>> returned that do not match Product.productNumber. Which is confusing. >>> >>> I haven’t had a chance to look through recent commits yet but plan to do >>> that later today. Just wanted to check and see - does anybody have any >>> insight about this? >>> >>> Tim >>> UCLA GSE&IS >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. >>> Webobjects-dev mailing list (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com) >>> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: >>> https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/lists.fabian%40e-lumo.com >>> >>> This email sent to lists.fab...@e-lumo.com >> > > > _______________________________________________ > Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. > Webobjects-dev mailing list (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com) > Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: > https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/lists%40thetimmy.com > > This email sent to li...@thetimmy.com _______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Webobjects-dev mailing list (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com This email sent to arch...@mail-archive.com