you wrote:
> Assuming that a skilled WO developer is a very endangered species, and cost
> you an arm and a leg ($60k - $120k) and you need several of this birds to
> put together a typical WOF project, what the hell are here the folks talking
> about?
Well, for simple, small projects, where the price is an issue, you
don't need such skilled people. Your average Java programmer can
hack up a "direct to web" app in an afternoon, and WO is good for
that sort of stuff, just too expensive to be in that market.
That's why I said before: It's not that WO is too expensive,
for what it can do. It's just pricing itself out of a much bigger
market share for projects that could be done simply and swiftly with
WO, but don't even need half of what it can do...
> What about killing this subject?
Yup. The relevant points have been made. It's up to Apple now
to (not) act.
Ronald
==============================================================================
"The reasonable man adapts himself to the world; the unreasonable one persists
in trying to adapt the world to himself. Therefore all progress depends on the
unreasonable man." G.B. Shaw | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | NeXT-mail welcome
