Ok. You're annoyed at the licensing model because you're currently 
hitting the TPM limit on the developer version. You have 3 frames in 
your page, which for some reason are all dynamic, since if they 
weren't going through WO they wouldn't count as a transaction.

  So, that translates to 8.3 pages/min in the developer version.

  So your developers are pulling up a page every 7.3 seconds?

  So really, they're running through the application at a high rate 
of speed because they know where everything is, intimately.

  But will _real_ users run through things that fast? The 4 pages per minute
 you quote seems kind of fast. (Unless you're loading stock prices?) 
15 seconds isn't a lot of time to download the page, render it in the 
browser, read the page, and click on something. I'd expect 1 page per 
minute on average.



>
> *** Once again I URGE all developers who find this pricing model unfair to
> bring these issues up with their Apple account rep.


  Lets just talk Apple into having two licensing paths:

  a per-user INTRAnet model, and a per transaction INTERnet model.

  Everyone wins when things scale. I like the new scheme because it 
scales for my customers business model (internet), you hate it 
because it doesn't scale for yours (intranet).

 The real gotcha I see is that Apple doesn't really have any way to 
enforce a per-user license, but a TPM license was easy to implement. 
The per user licenses were always kind of honorary.

 Pierce
----------------------------------------------------------------
  Pierce T. Wetter III, Director, Twin Forces, Inc.
  e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Phone:520-779-4227
  <http://www.twinforces.com/>
U.S. Mail: 1300 South Milton Rd, Suite 206, Flagstaff, AZ 86001

Reply via email to