On 8/23/07, Tzury <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > People simply don't know how great and powerful yet simple our > framework is. > If you think web.py is a great python-web-framework, and disagree with > the terms used at this blog's comments regarding web.py, you may > consider saying it out loud over there:
The general theme of that blog post is that the Python frameworks field is starting to congeal into a few popular frameworks, and that other developers should adopt the more popular frameworks to unify the field and push back on RoR inroads. I have to say that I generally agree with the blog, but I prefer to use webpy because it meets my requirements. The author is not claiming all other frameworks are inferior, per se, but that popularity trumps. Logically, it's argumentum ad populum. Politically, it makes sense to rally around the flag and repel the RoR invaders (so to speak). My caveat is that flag should be critically reviewed and re-engineered as necessary to make it pythonic. -- Ben Wilson "Words are the only thing which will last forever" Churchill --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "web.py" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/webpy?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
